Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MERCHANT Reza H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 2 | ANDREEV Arthur | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 3 | BAKER Kevin G. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 3 | LEIGH David A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 5 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 6 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 8 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 9 | CHIN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 10 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 11 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 12 | CHA Russell W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
| 13 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 14 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 15 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 16 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 17 | DIXON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 18 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
| 19 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | KIM William M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | LIU Frank | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 23 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 24 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 25 | SUICO Zachary Emanuel O. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 26 | POLKOVSKY Dylan S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
| 27 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | MACKIN Samuel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 31 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 32 | JIN Alexander | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 35 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | FERREIRA Noah J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | PERSAUD Daivik | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
| 40 | TUCKER Owen J. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 42 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 43 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 100% | 75% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 45 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 46 | FELDMAN Jaemin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 47 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | HONG James | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | CHEUNG Liyan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 95% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 53 | TONG Chihao | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | REYES Vincent | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 55 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | WU Joseph | 100% | 86% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | LAI Coby | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | LEE Jonathan | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIU Jack | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | DIXON Thomas | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 60 | CONNELL Jay | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 62 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 63 | KERN Joseph | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | CHERUKURI Harshil | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.