Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZUSIN Zachary W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
2 | LUTAR Lucas N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
3 | PETER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
3 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
5 | JOHNSON Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
6 | DING Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
7 | DU Samuel R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
8 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
9 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
10 | KATAYAMA Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
11 | ZHANG Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 9% |
12 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
13 | LEE Daniel C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | |
14 | CRALEY Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
15 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
16 | SCHULTES Evans | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
17 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
18 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
19 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
20 | LAURICELLA Douglas | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
21 | YU Vinni | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 19% | |
22 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
23 | LIU Eric P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
24 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
25 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
26 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | KAZA Nitish | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
28 | LOCKWOOD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
29 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | - | |
30 | FU Samuel Y. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
31 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
32 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
33 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
34 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | AHN Jun | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
36 | LIN Richard W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | |
37 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
38 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
39 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
40 | BAS Liam | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
41 | LIU Kevin B. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
42 | WU Jerry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
43 | BALL James T. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
44 | SHIKHMAN Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 9% | - |
45 | MILLER Trent D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
46 | IVARSSON Oliver | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
47 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
49 | WALOR Owen T. | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
50 | ECK Nathaniel | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | KIZHNER Fillip | 100% | 50% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
52 | MCLENDON Diego | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
53 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 78% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
54 | HU Robin | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
55 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
57 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 96% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
58 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
59 | BAO Wenyuan | 100% | 48% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
60 | MACRAE Harrison A. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | BING Charles | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
62 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
63 | QI Steve | 100% | 88% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
64 | RADTKE Jakob | 100% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.