Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | |
| 2 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 3 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 13% | |
| 3 | NI Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 5 | BELSLEY Devon K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 6 | KULKARNI Diya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
| 7 | MAO Amy | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 9 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 15% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 11 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | LEE Olive | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 13 | LU Junyao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 14 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 16 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 22% | 3% | |
| 17 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 18 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 19 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 21 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | COBERT Helen G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 23 | BIGGS Amelia F. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 25 | PARTE Isabella B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | 3% | |
| 26 | NICOU Nicole | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | XU Jessica | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
| 29 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 30 | LIN Julia L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | BRANDWEIN Elizabeth | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | LI AnnieSiliang | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | GUZZI Jordan | 100% | 79% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 100% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | HARJANI Meher | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | XU Amy | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 40 | LI Alisha | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | PATEL Viha | 100% | 86% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 42 | BONAR Natalia | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | SHI Angela L. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.