Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DOOLEY Atticus | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | ZEYU wu | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | LEE Nathan Uju | V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | HAO Johnny | V V V D D | V V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 5 | LUC Linkin | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | XIAO Brayden | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 7 | CHAN Troy Devon | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | SLOAN Ethan | V V D V D | V V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | KIM Enoch | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | TENG Lucas | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | BRIMMER Robert (Trey) | V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 12 | GATTO Enzo P. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 13 | PI Edwin | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 14 | AN Chris | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 15 | SUN Eon | V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 16 | KIM Suin | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 17 | LOPEZ Mateo | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 18 | XIE Justin | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 19 | TANG Morgan | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 20 | FISCHER Noel | V V V V V D | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 21 | SUN Ryan | V D V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 22 | CHEN Zhengming | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 23 | WARD Carter | V V V V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 24 | YANG Jake | V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 25 | ZHANG KAIQI | V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 26 | LIN Ethan | D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 27 | WONG Ron | D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 28 | HAN Kyle | D V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 29 | LIU Clarence | V V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 30 | SAHA Aadi | V V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 31 | LVOVSKIY Roman | V D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 32 | OU Rigel | V D V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 33 | KIM Leo | V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 34 | LO Elroy | V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 35 | CHEN Aaron | V V V V D D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 36 | SAHA Aryan | D V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 37 | GONZALEZ Paul | V V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 38 | FUGATE Logan | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 39 | CHOI LIAM | D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 40 | DENG Richard | D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 41 | RAPHAEL Pierson | D V V D V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 42 | QI Jeremy | D V V D D V | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 43 | DESAI Arthav | D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 44 | LEE Alexander | D D V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 46 | WANG James | D V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 47 | KUNIMOTO Adam | D V D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 48 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 49 | LEE Winston | V D D D V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 50 | QI Zach | V D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 51 | WANG David | D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 51 | RHODES Bryce | D V V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 53 | SUN alan | D V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 54 | PARK Jayden | D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 55 | GUO Jonathan | D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 56 | SU Eric | V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 57 | KIM Noah | V D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 58 | MOROAICA Seiku | V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 59 | HORN Diodorus | V D D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 60 | TONG Evan | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 61 | LEE Jayden Junhyuk | D V D V D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 62 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | D D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 63 | LOVELL Jackson | D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 64 | NGUYEN Ethan | D D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 65 | CHEUNG Evan | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 67 | LAM Ethan | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 68 | LEI Isaac | V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 69 | RAMOS Pious | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 70 | WONG Alexander | D D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 71 | HUNG Jaden | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 72 | WU Allen | V D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 73 | LAMORI Matt | D D V D V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 74 | HIROTA Jackson | D D D V D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 75 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 76 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 77 | DING Orlando | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 78 | HSIEH Maxwell | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 78 | HSIEH Sebastian | D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 80 | CHEN Dylan | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 81 | HIROTA Mitchell | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 82 | JUNG Andres | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 83 | LIU Paul | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 84 | FERRING Theo | D D D D V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
| 85 | DOUGLAS Milo | V D D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 86 | LOH Dylan | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 87 | BODO John | D D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 88 | XIN Ryan | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 89 | WU Dustin | D D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 90 | PHAN Ethan | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 91 | HSU Nicholas | D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 92 | ZHANG Connery | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 93 | HULL Eason | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 94 | GUO ATTICUS | D D D D D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 | |
| 95 | DUGGIREDDY Ronav | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 96 | CHEN Maorui | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 97 | CHAN Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.