Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center - National Harbor, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BYK Karalina | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 2 | WU Gloria | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 42% | 12% |
| 3 | MILLER Anna | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 3 | WANG Joann | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 5 | JU Victoria | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 6 | DONG Audrey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 7 | CHEN bridgette | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 8 | SHI Cathy | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
| 9 | HUANG Emma | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 10 | FANG Savannah | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 12 | WANG Manny | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 40% | 6% |
| 13 | HUANG Jiayu | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 14 | LI Beatrice | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 15 | DING Jessica | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | CIORUN Isabella | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 17 | CHEN Arianna | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 18 | TELEB Amina | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 19 | DOMINIK Eliana | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | |
| 20 | MORONES Alieza | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | MCCLAIN Grayce | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 22 | CHUNG Sera | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Michelle | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 24 | ZHENG Rachel | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 25 | ZHANG Selene T. | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 26 | DING Athena | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 27 | CHANG Paige Yijae | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 28 | HALLEY Jacqueline | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | ZHAO Evelyn | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | SUN Leia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | GAO Evelyn | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 32 | NAM Jiwon | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HO Avery | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | CAO Kexin | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PATEL Tiana | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | LIM EDELINE | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | ISAAC Felicity | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | NAYLOR Michaela | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 39 | CHEN Aria | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | CHUNG Yena | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | YU Thea | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 42 | LI Hoi lam hanna | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | KASHUBA Adriana | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 44 | LI Catherine | 2% | 17% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LEE Alethea | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | ZHU Leona | 9% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | WANG Christina | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | YE Miriam | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | ZHAO Adelina | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | FIELD Nina | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | RUPARELIYA Alisha | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | KIM Lisel | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GUTKOVSKIY Chloe | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 54 | HAN Charlotte | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | MAYES-POURNARAS Zara | 43% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Amber | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 57 | ZHU Chelsea | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | GAMBREL Holland | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | DUBOISKAYA Sofia | 49% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Julia | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | WANG Amelia | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.