Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KUMBLA Samarth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 2 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 3 | BANERJEE ANUP | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% |
| 3 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 5 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 13% | |
| 6 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
| 7 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 8 | XIAO Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 10% | |
| 9 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 10 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 11 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 12 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
| 13 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 15 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 10% |
| 16 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 17 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 18 | OTAKE Jared K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 22% |
| 19 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 20 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 14% | |
| 21 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 24% | |
| 22 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 23 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 25 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 32 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% |
| 33 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 34 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | KHER Roan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 36 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 37 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 97% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | LEE Jesse | 100% | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | ELLIS Preston Y. | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 43 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | TANG Adrian | 100% | 75% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | WOO Christian | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | LIN Richard | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | KIM BANSEOK | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 50 | ARREDONDO Rafael | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | WONG Louis | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | SMITH Grant D. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | DORMAN Patrick | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | VINOD Konark | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | |
| 55 | LIZARRAGA Sebastian | 100% | 39% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 58 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.