Supreme Courts Basketball Academy - LAS VEGAS, NV, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PYO Juhee | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 2 | PARK Yuna | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 3 | KANE Chloe | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 3 | JEON Hyoyeon | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 5 | YOON Claire | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 6 | CHEONG Chloe | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 7 | GULLY Wren | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 8 | BARTON Isabelle | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 9 | CHAN Allison M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% |
| 10 | HEINRICHS Aaliyah | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 11 | SAUCEDO Grecia | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | KROTZ Gemma | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 46% | 9% |
| 13 | LLOYD Melanie | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 14 | LU Chloe | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 15 | THOMSON Sarah | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 16 | HANEY Kimberly M. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | CHO Jacey | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | CHOI Hyunseo | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 19 | GARCIA Sophia Noelle | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 20 | KOHLER Chrissy | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | < 1% | - | - |
| 21 | CHIEM Karen | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
| 22 | HATHAWAY Alesya | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | LAMOREAUX Collette | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 25 | REYNOLDS Elly | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 26 | RADOV Una | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 27 | RALSTON Katherine | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | BACK Ella | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 29 | CHO Anya | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | YUMIACO Nylah | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | BOWEN Victoria M. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | THOMAS Mackenzie | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | HALUSHKO Liliia | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | PRIMES Amanda M. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | KUEHL Anaka | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | RICH Caroline B. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
| 37 | LAMOREAUX Savannah | 25% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | SIU Angela | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | DANIELS Kirsten | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 40 | CARLTON Ella | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MARTIN Danielle | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | LONGORIA Fernanda | 27% | 46% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.