Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KAULL James | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 2 | MAO Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 40% | 9% |
| 3 | WHITE Sean | - | - | - | - | 6% | 94% | |
| 3 | SIMMONS Ariel Joshua | - | - | - | 2% | 28% | 69% | |
| 5 | HILBERT Gabriel | - | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 31% | 5% |
| 6 | SHELANSKI Isaac | - | - | 2% | 27% | 58% | 14% | |
| 7 | PIASIO Jack | - | - | 3% | 24% | 57% | 16% | |
| 8 | CHEN Leonardo | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% | |
| 9 | ISAAC Joseph | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | |
| 10 | MOORE Shomari | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% | |
| 11 | BEDOR William | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 12 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | 2% | 22% | 47% | 29% | 1% | |
| 13 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | KARIMOV Amir | - | 3% | 26% | 47% | 23% | - | |
| 15 | KOKENGE Reid | - | 1% | 11% | 56% | 29% | 3% | |
| 16 | CARPENTER Liam | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 48% | |
| 17 | CAI Brian | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 30% | 3% | |
| 17 | CHEN Edward | 2% | 15% | 42% | 35% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | CHOI Joong Kyung | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 9% | |
| 20 | RIM Eugene | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | YI Yohan Pagel | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | LAWLOR Lee | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | SUN Lucas | 9% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | MILLER Andrew | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | NG Nico | 28% | 48% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | DURKIN Hudson | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | - | 4% | 34% | 45% | 16% | - | |
| 29 | DANIEL Camron | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 3% | |
| 30 | DATSON David | 51% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 16% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ZHAI Junqi | 1% | 23% | 48% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | RVACHEV Michael | 2% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | MARTINSON Torm | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | CHO Adrian | 10% | 64% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | KOEPPEL Levi | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 37 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 22% | 48% | 28% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | LIN Yufei | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | WU Jerry | 10% | 41% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MA Sean | 19% | 47% | 31% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | ANDERSON Eric | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | ANDERSON Connor | 83% | 16% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | LUNIEVICZ Joseph | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.