Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SUAREZ Rafael A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 48% | 32% | |
| 3 | CHO Michael | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 34% | |
| 3 | GONZALEZ II John L. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 5 | LOPEZ Reynaldo (REY) | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
| 6 | HARKINS Craig T. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% | |
| 7 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% | |
| 7 | TYSHCHENKO Andrey | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
| 9 | POPOKH Leo | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
| 10 | ZHANG Jie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 3% |
| 11 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% | |
| 12 | SIRICO Thomas (Tommy) P. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 30% | |
| 13 | WAY Kashi M. | - | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
| 14 | ZHAO Zhiyong | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% | |
| 16 | TANG Julian | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 17 | CHENG Thomas | 1% | 14% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 18 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% | |
| 18 | MUELLER Donn | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 20 | VALENTINE Iain | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 21 | WU Clarence C. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - |
| 22 | RIFFATERRE Jason | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | - |
| 23 | KENT Dwain | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | FRENZINGER Douglas | - | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | |
| 25 | LEE Hans | 21% | 50% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | CLAYTON Byron | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | WOOD BEn | 14% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | NEWELL Tim | 49% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | GERACI Paul A. | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SPRINGER Michael | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 15% | 49% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 34 | BALBOA Rolando M. | - | 10% | 40% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | KIM Ethan | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | LEYLAND John | 8% | 50% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | MONSEFI Amir | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | TOWSTER Robert | 57% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 2% | 19% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 42 | STOY Patrick | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | RUSANOV Oleg | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.