Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HURME Tommi K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | ||
| 2 | HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 3 | MACZIK Adam W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 3 | LIOU Solomon | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 5 | CONKLIN Jim | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 7% | ||
| 6 | SPROWLES Cameron D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 14% |
| 7 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 8 | MAKMATOV Vadim | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 9 | TSINIS Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 74% |
| 10 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 11 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 15% | |
| 12 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
| 13 | COX Matthew T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 14 | DEPAUW Devan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% | - |
| 15 | CHU Brandon A. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 16 | FIEDERLEIN Andrew M. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 18 | FENOUL Frederic | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 69% | |
| 19 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 8% | ||
| 20 | LEWIS-RAMIREZ Ben | 100% | 93% | 55% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | MCGRATH Sean L. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | GOLCU Doruk | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 23 | STOCK Jordan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | ELBAG Mark H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 25 | POTTER Joshua (Josh) M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 26 | MCNALLY Thomas J. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | LAWLOR Lee | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | KIM Jeff | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 2% | - |
| 29 | VALENTINE Shem | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | MORET Eric N. | 100% | 82% | 34% | 6% | - | ||
| 31 | KRIEGER Nathanial | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | SUCHOSKI Annika | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | ISAAC Mena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 34 | EVERT Todd | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% | 3% | |
| 35 | PEI Suyang | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | REED David | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | FULLER II Thomas | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | ||
| 40 | TURNER Joshua | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | CHI Kai-Hung | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | COLE Matthew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 43 | MIZRAHI Meir | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.