Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AMELI Sean | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 3 | WATRALL Rick | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% | |
| 3 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 5 | FRANK Fred | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 6 | OCHS Bradley C. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | MCDONNELL Michael | 6% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | FREY Wayne N. | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 9 | WALTING Paul J. | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 10 | LANG Markus | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 43% | 20% |
| 11 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 4% |
| 12 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 13 | BECK Brian C. | 26% | 44% | 25% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
| 14 | EDWARDS Tim | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 15 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 16 | VARNEY John R. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 17 | SUPONYA Sergey | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 34% | |
| 18 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 19 | EVANS Allen L. | 1% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LIPTON Michael D. | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 21 | BOLDUC PATRICE | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | NIXON Mark | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 23 | RANES Evan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 24 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 26 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
| 27 | HUGHES Michael D. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HITCHCOCK David | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 29 | BRUS Brian V. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | CRETEN joachim | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | SWANSON Dave | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | GREGORY Dean | 1% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | BAER Bryan G. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 37 | WAGMAN Robert S. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | PAVLOVICH Robert | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 39 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | JENSEN David | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 41 | BAXTER David | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BEITTEL David F. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | POPPRE Michael N. | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | WHITELOCK James R. | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | TREANOR Donald K. | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | MASE James B. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 47 | HERROD Christopher N. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | KRUGER Mark | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | SIMS Martin L. | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | HAYENGA Gary M. | - | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 51 | CISNEROS Robert A. | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LONADIER Robert | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | MALLOY Christopher B. | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.