Duke Energy Convention Center - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | AMELI Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
| 3 | WATRALL Rick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 3 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
| 5 | FRANK Fred | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 6 | OCHS Bradley C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
| 7 | MCDONNELL Michael | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 8 | FREY Wayne N. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 9 | WALTING Paul J. | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 10 | LANG Markus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% |
| 11 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
| 12 | KAROLAK Dale W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 13 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 74% | 30% | 5% | < 1% | - | - |
| 14 | EDWARDS Tim | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 15 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 16 | VARNEY John R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 17 | SUPONYA Sergey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
| 18 | LOEFFLER Carl E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 19 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 21 | BOLDUC PATRICE | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 22 | NIXON Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 23 | RANES Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 24 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 26 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% |
| 27 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 29 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | FANGMAN Daniel L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | CRETEN joachim | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 32 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | GREGORY Dean | 100% | 99% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | O'DOWD Andrew J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 36 | BAER Bryan G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 37 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | PAVLOVICH Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 39 | KERTESZ Stefan G. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | JENSEN David | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 41 | BAXTER David | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BEITTEL David F. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | POPPRE Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | WHITELOCK James R. | 100% | 88% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | TREANOR Donald K. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 46 | MASE James B. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 47 | HERROD Christopher N. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 47 | KRUGER Mark | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | SIMS Martin L. | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 18% |
| 51 | CISNEROS Robert A. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LONADIER Robert | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | MALLOY Christopher B. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.