Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Chandler M. | D V V D V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 2 | RHYU Kozmo | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | RINEHART Conner M. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 3 | LEE Timothy S. | D V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 5 | KUMAR Anitya | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 6 | PICCUS Isaac S. | V V V D V | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 7 | PARK Ian C. | V V D D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 8 | KIM Edward J. | V D D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 9 | KIM Minjun | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 10 | PLUMER Jack E. | V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 11 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | D V V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 12 | CHEN Eric Y. | V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 13 | O'HARA Keegan J. | V V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | LIU John | V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 16 | CRANE Matthew T. | D D D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 17 | YIM Alex | V V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | YOON Nathan | V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 19 | KROPP Jack | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | ZHANG Andrew | V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 21 | MIN MARCUS | V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 23 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 24 | HODGE Jaydon L. | V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 25 | SALISBURY Cary | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 26 | FREEMAN Daniel H. | V D D D D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 27 | STEVENS Daniel | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 28 | XIA Owen | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 29 | CHAWLA Armaan | D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 30 | JOSEPH William | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | D D D V D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 32 | LEE Shwan | D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | SHAH Anuj | D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 33 | YI Jason | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | LU Sebastian X. | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.