Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WIMMER Chandler M. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 2 | RHYU Kozmo | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% |
| 3 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% |
| 3 | LEE Timothy S. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 5 | KUMAR Anitya | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 6 | PICCUS Isaac S. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 7 | PARK Ian C. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 8 | KIM Edward J. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 9 | KIM Minjun | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | PLUMER Jack E. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% |
| 11 | ZHENG Yuanlong (Bill) | 8% | 39% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 12 | CHEN Eric Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 13 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 14 | LIU John | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 15 | LI Jeffrey | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% |
| 16 | CRANE Matthew T. | 2% | 18% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | YIM Alex | - | 4% | 24% | 50% | 21% | |
| 18 | YOON Nathan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 19 | KROPP Jack | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
| 20 | ZHANG Andrew | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | MIN MARCUS | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | RODRIGUEZ Ryan | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 23 | STUBBLEFIELD Alexander | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | SALISBURY Cary | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | FREEMAN Daniel H. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
| 27 | STEVENS Daniel | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | XIA Owen | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | CHAWLA Armaan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | JOSEPH William | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 31 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | LEE Shwan | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | SHAH Anuj | 12% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YI Jason | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 35 | LU Sebastian X. | 9% | 40% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.