Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Anya | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 2 | CHEN bridgette | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 3 | SAIFEE Sakina | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 3 | WU Gloria | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 5 | BYK Karalina | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 6 | HUANG Emma | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 7 | WANG Joann | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 8 | ZHANG Selene T. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 9 | DING Jessica | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 10 | CHEN Michelle | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | MORONES Alieza | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 12 | JU Victoria | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 13 | KIM Rylie | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 14 | WEN Lillian | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 15 | JONES Parker | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 2% |
| 16 | WANG Manny | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 17 | TURBAT Celine | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | LI Beatrice | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 19 | LIN Clara | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 20 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 21 | FU Angela | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | MILLER Anna | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 23 | DONG Audrey | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 24 | PEROJO Angie | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 25 | HOLSTAD Anneliese | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | CHEN Chloe | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | TUNG Alison | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 28 | MCCLAIN Grayce | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 29 | TAGNE Zoey | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | SHI Cathy | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 31 | HUANG Jiayu | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 32 | CHEN Arianna | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | JIANG Mujing | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 34 | SHU Kayla | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | ZHAO Evelyn | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 36 | RUPARELIYA Alisha | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 37 | WANG Sally | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 38 | DOMINIK Eliana | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | HUFFMAN Seraphina | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | FANG Savannah | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 3% |
| 41 | WILKINS Aviella | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | HO Avery | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | SINGH Aditi | 18% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | YOON Adeline | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MARENITCH Kara | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | CHUNG Sera | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 47 | LIN Tiffany | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 48 | YI Helen | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | TELEB Amina | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 50 | GONZALEZ Alexandra | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | LEE Madison | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 52 | ROLKOWSKI Mia | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | PAN Nina | 26% | 45% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | WANG Kelly | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 55 | PICACHE Camilla | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | FANG Yining | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 57 | DAI Claire | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 58 | PATEL Tiana | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 59 | LOPUS Marlena | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | CHEUNG Arya | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 60 | ZHU Chelsea | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 62 | HOGAN Amelie | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | CURRIER-BLAGG Bryn | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | GISZCZAK Emma | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | MURPHY Ava | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 66 | KIM Lisel | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 67 | DU Cecilia | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | YU Thea | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 69 | KNOX aysa | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 70 | DUBOISKAYA Sofia | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 71 | GUTKOVSKIY Chloe | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | TURNER Maris | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 73 | EVERT Darcy | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 74 | TAKAHASHI Rio | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.