Huntington Convention Center of Cleveland - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JUBILEE Beata | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 69% | |
| 2 | CHANEY Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | ||
| 3 | YANG Nina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 19% |
| 3 | CHUNG Yenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 19% | |
| 5 | URICHECK Julianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 6 | ZHAO Crystal | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 7 | ERATA Selena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 8 | WANG Hailie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 10 | CHONG Emma | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 11 | LIU Brinley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 12 | WANG Phoebe | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 7% | |
| 13 | DEFENSOR Ella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | ||
| 14 | FAYEZ Malika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | |
| 15 | CHOI Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
| 16 | RYU Natalee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 17 | DOROSHKEVICH Maria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 18 | XIAO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 19 | MU Jasmine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
| 20 | LAU Carys Bella | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | ||
| 21 | SALIBA Madison | 100% | 98% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | RONG Hilary | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 23 | AINSWORTH Esme | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% | |
| 24 | ZHAO Rachel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 25 | WU Angela | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 26 | DAI Amy | 100% | 93% | 55% | 15% | 1% | ||
| 27 | SHIH Eva | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | |
| 28 | WONG Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 29 | YOU Nina | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | CAHALANE Alexa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 32 | KUANG Isabella | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | HONG Catherine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 34 | YAO Astrid | 100% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | VILLER Gabriella | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
| 36 | YU Catherine | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 37 | GORDON Winter | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LEE Zerah | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | COONEY Kyla | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 5% | ||
| 40 | GROMOVA Vlada | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 8% | ||
| 41 | LIOU Skylar | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | |
| 42 | GROMOVA Eva | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | SAPKOTA Avelyn | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | HARSAR Cleo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% | |
| 45 | SRIKUREJA Ayla | 100% | 83% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | MAO Faith | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 8% | ||
| 47 | YE Charlotte | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | XIANG Kellina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | TANG Sophie | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | FARIAS Francesca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 51 | MAKATOVA Aisha | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 52 | MORTON Penelope | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | ALVAREZ Megan | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | BIRZ Vivi | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | WAGENAAR Ava | 100% | 90% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ABDELFATAH Laila | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | LEE Katherine | 100% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 58 | KIM Eila | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 58 | XIA Kaelynn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 60 | LOUVOT Chloe | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | SOMANI Iam | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | TATINI Aria | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 62 | KIM Madeline | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | ||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.