Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
| 2 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 3 | TAN Benjamin | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 38% | 33% | 5% |
| 3 | JIN Yucheng | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 5 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 41% | 31% |
| 6 | HO Kasper | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 7 | WANG Eason | - | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 4% |
| 8 | ZHOU jiatong | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
| 9 | SUN Roy | - | - | - | - | 3% | 28% | 69% |
| 10 | TURBAT Travis | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 10 | SUN Lucas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 18% |
| 12 | ZHANG William | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 13 | CREMEL Remi | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 14 | KAJITA Grayson | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 15 | ZENG Cayden | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | TROYANKER Makar | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 17 | LIN Sampson | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 45% | 9% |
| 18 | SINGH Reyaansh | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 19 | YAN Aaron | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 20 | LEE Elliot | - | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | KUK Francis | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 22 | MA Justin | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 23 | SHAO Tysen | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 2% |
| 24 | HUANG Owen | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 25 | LIN Dylan | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | MENG Andy | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | CAO Benjamin | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 28 | SHA Lambor | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 29 | XU Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | YIN Luke | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 31 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 32 | RAJ Yojith | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 33 | CHOI William | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 34 | SCHOR William | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 35 | KIM Ryan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | ZHANG Bryant | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Benjamin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 38 | KHANDAN MILAN | 29% | 41% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LI Mason | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | BHANGOO Arman | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 40 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 42 | LUO Derren | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | BAGWELL Theodore | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CHANG Owen | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | STOCK Ian | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HSU Jacob | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 47 | NGO Lincoln | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 48 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
| 49 | MENG Eric | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 50 | LITVACK Jackson | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KIM Noah | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | ZHOU Osborn | 5% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | DOMANTAY Dylan | 5% | 29% | 44% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | SHIN Daniel Y. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DONG YIKUN | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 56 | NGUYEN Remy | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 57 | TOTH Leland | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 58 | ZUO Thomas | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | CHEN Ian | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PHILLIPS Julian | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | WU Kangdi | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Charlie | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 62 | CHONG Tanner | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 64 | ANDERSON Stellan | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | WANG Andy | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | KIM Ryan | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SINGH Shiv | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | ZHOU Milo | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | LU David | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 70 | SHANG Jason | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | YUAN Vincent | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LIU Kingston | 30% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 73 | WANG Mason | 8% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | HE Andrew | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | HERNANDEZ Oliver | 7% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | WANG Jacob | 34% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.