Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GALANG Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | |
| 2 | CHEN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 3 | LEE Hubert Junhu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
| 3 | CHANG Allen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | |
| 5 | JIA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | |
| 6 | SHETTY Vikram | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | |
| 7 | YANG Collin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 8 | LEE Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 9 | WU August | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 10 | HWANG Noah | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 11 | LAM Dylan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 12 | JIANG Hardy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 13 | ANDERSON Bradley | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | LI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 15 | QIU Carson | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | TAM Ethan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | YANG Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
| 18 | PAN Wesley | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | QIAO Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 20 | YAN Kaysen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 21 | WOO Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | GHATTAS August | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
| 23 | FERNANDEZ leo | 100% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | WANG Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 5% | |
| 25 | WANG YUHAO | 100% | 94% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | HWANG Leo | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 27 | JIANG Harry | 100% | 94% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | WAN Andrew | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | LEE Caleb | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
| 30 | CHENG Daniel | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | CHANG Jarrett | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 32 | KIM Dylan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 33 | HAO Jefferson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 34 | HORIKAWA Xander | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | JUNG Diego | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | XIA Daniel | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | LEE Damian | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | WANG Grayson | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | DAVIDSON Ethan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Jiahang | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | LEUNG Ian | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | WEN yushuo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 2% | |
| 43 | NGUYEN Phinix | 100% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.