Ontario Convention Center - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 2 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 3 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 21% |
| 3 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 6 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 7 | LIANG Donny | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 3% |
| 8 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 9 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
| 10 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 11 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
| 12 | BROWN Korbyn | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | ||
| 13 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 13 | DENG Destin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 15 | HWANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
| 18 | LI Grayson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 19 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 20 | MARENCIK Miles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 21 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 22 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 22 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 24 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 42% | 10% |
| 25 | OLIVAS Joseph | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | FRANCK Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 39% | 5% |
| 28 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 29 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | ||
| 30 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | GUO Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 11% |
| 32 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 33 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 34 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 35 | HAMILTON Travis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 36 | DENG Henry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 37 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 38 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 39 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 40 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 41 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 42 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 43 | PARRA Lucas | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | LUCENAY Samuel | 100% | 97% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 46 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SHETTY Rohit | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 49 | KOU Mason | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CHIEN Ian | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | ||
| 52 | QIAO James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 53 | MENG Haoyi | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 54 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 55 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 84% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 57 | YIM Antonio | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 59 | HUANG Eason | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 61 | SAMIMI Sina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 62 | ONG David | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 63 | MAI Sy | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | NUGENT Curtis | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 67 | TAVERNA Matteo | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | NOLAN Morgan | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | SUN Jerry | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 70 | LOUIE Kyle | 100% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 71 | ROBINSON Dax | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 72 | HERNANDEZ-ALDANA Miguel | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 73 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 74 | LIU Max | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 75 | OR Anson | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 76 | YUN Nicholas | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 77 | CHAN Nathan | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 79 | BYUN Matthew | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | HOBBS Fineas | 100% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 81 | ROLAND Nikolas | 100% | 83% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | COIMBATORE Dillon | 100% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 83 | RAJPRABHU Pranesh | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 84 | MARTEGANI Enea | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 84 | SONG Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 86 | ORTMANN Noah | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 87 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 88 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 99% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.