Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
2 | ZHU Max | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 17% |
3 | KIM Darius H. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
3 | KOPPE Alexander | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
5 | RYAN Seth C. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
6 | WONG Nathan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
7 | SCHENCK Theo | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 2% |
8 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
9 | JIN daniel | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
10 | FORTNER Lance R. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
11 | KOSLU Aidan D. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
12 | MOHEBI Saam | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
13 | CHUNG Thomas | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
14 | SPEICHER Brian E. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
15 | KOH Tommy | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | BERSHIN Izzy | 1% | 11% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
17 | NGO Ethan | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
18 | CHU Anthony | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
19 | DALVA Michael | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
20 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | KOPPE Benjamin | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
22 | FEES HOLDEN | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
23 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
24 | MONDALA Adrian | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
25 | MUIR Douglas K. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
26 | MCGINLEY Walker | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
27 | COPEN Samuel S. | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.