George Mason Recreational Athletics Complex (RAC) - Fairfax, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAFIDI Joseph (Joey) F. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 2 | CARTER Austin L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 3 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 3 | BAGHA Armin | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% | |
| 5 | CHRISTY Peter C. | - | - | 4% | 33% | 48% | 15% | |
| 6 | WHEELER Daniel | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 39% |
| 7 | HALE Bradley | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 8 | WATERS Nathaniel | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | SO Lorenzo | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | WHITE Myles | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 11 | LEE Benjamin | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 12 | PERILLO Edoardo Filippo Mihai | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% |
| 13 | RAWSON Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 14 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 4% | 30% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 16 | TANG Justin | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 17 | TARCHICHI Robby | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | |
| 18 | HITCHCOCK David | - | - | 4% | 26% | 61% | 9% | |
| 19 | LEHFELDT Damien S. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 19 | SONG Zhihao | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 35% | 4% |
| 21 | KOOB Julian | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 22 | NOSIL Andrew S. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 36% | |
| 22 | KIM Daniel | 21% | 47% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
| 24 | LEECH Braedan | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 25 | SMOTHERS Nathan | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | CHENH Justin | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 26 | RAPALSKI Thomas | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 28 | MILLER Luke | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 29 | BAYUS Oliver | 2% | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | MONTESI Eric | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 31 | PENNER Kyle D. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
| 32 | GRAMLICH Bradley | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SAAL Anna | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 34 | PANE Patrick | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 35 | MCCLEAN III Walter F. | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | SZIEDE Kieran | 1% | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | STULAK Brendan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 38 | PERI Mourya | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | CANDELARIA Armando | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
| 40 | WALLACE George | - | - | 7% | 42% | 41% | 10% | |
| 41 | KE Sebastian | 1% | 10% | 38% | 43% | 8% | - | |
| 41 | CAVE Rylan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 43 | PRAKASH Rahul | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | PALPANDIAN Ilanchezhian | 4% | 47% | 39% | 9% | - | - | |
| 45 | FEAGIN Patrick | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 46 | SHIN Jamie | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | SHELLY Emery | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 48 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 49 | KROPP Anne | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 50 | HUANG Taohua | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 51 | HO Lucas | 9% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | D'ANGELO Olivia | 22% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | SMITHSON Matthew | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | COYLE Emma | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | HAGERMAN Siona | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | LUNDEN Espen | 30% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | MOORE Mary | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 58 | SCHICKEL Juliana | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | THOMPSON Josh | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | STANDISH Zachary | 12% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | IYER Matthias | 41% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 62 | CASTRO Ryan | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 63 | COTHRAN Nicholas | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | NGUYEN Ethan | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.