Atlantic City Convention Center - Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 2 | KIM Henry | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
| 3 | MIDYANY Evan | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | |
| 3 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 51% |
| 5 | KABA Elias | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | ||
| 6 | HU Lucas | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 7 | LEE DoWon | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 8 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 12% |
| 9 | KIM Gene | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 10 | CHEN Tianjun | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% | |
| 11 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 12 | LEE Anton | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% |
| 13 | CHAU Collin | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 14 | CHEN Edward | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
| 15 | KATS Brandon | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | CHO Alex | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 18 | TANG Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | WANG Marcus | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% | |
| 20 | NAKAS Levent | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% | |
| 21 | GOVOROV Alexander | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 22 | TRAN Spencer | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 23 | KIM Remington | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHENG Jason | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 2% |
| 25 | LAU LUCAS | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 14% | ||
| 26 | LI Jade | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
| 27 | ADDYSON Aidan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 28 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | ZHU Yiming | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 30 | MARTISEK Martin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 31 | LIU Pan Iok | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | NG Nico | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
| 33 | GRIGORENKO Gleb | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 35 | TUNG Charlie | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | MIDYANY Ryan | - | 6% | 31% | 44% | 19% | ||
| 37 | GUO Benjamin | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | KONG Ethan | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | CUELLAR Markus | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
| 39 | ALABI Azryl | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | CHANEY Charles | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 41% | 12% |
| 42 | LIU Adam | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 42 | KIM Doyun | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 44 | CHANG Matthew | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | BHANDARE Veer | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | SAAD Peter | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | CHEN Evan | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% |
| 48 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | DATSON David | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 50 | PARIGIAN Alexander | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 51 | NOOL Aaron | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | ZHANG Jonathan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 53 | SATISHKUMAR Pranav | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 54 | NOOL Alexander | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 54 | YAO Aiden | 11% | 47% | 33% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 56 | YAO Ryan | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 57 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 58 | WANG Zhenhao | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | TSIEN Richard | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 60 | HONG Ethen | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LAI Jayden | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | SHCHUR Grayson | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 66 | LIN Lucas | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 67 | SAAD Noah | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LI Ryan | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 69 | JIANG Aidan | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 70 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | MCCANDLISH Owen | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ATKINS Elan | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | KHERSONSKY Robert | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 74 | TANG Colin | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 75 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 76 | CHEN Daniel | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 77 | WEI Jayden | 31% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 78 | LEE Elijah | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 79 | ZHU Brady | 24% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 81 | KO Ethan | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 82 | CHEN Jayden A | 16% | 44% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | HU HAOYUE | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 84 | CHEN Cameron | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 85 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 86 | DOAN Christopher | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 87 | CHEN Aiden | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 88 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 89 | BARTON Christian | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 90 | LOPATIN Sergei | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 91 | SCHMIDT Paxton | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 92 | WANG Ivan | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | TANG Luke | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 94 | CHIANG William | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 95 | TOPRANI Valmik | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 96 | FENG Xinmin | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 97 | CARPENTER Touma S. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 98 | PILLAI Aditya | 64% | 31% | 4% | - | - | ||
| 99 | YU George | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.