Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | |
| 2 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 3 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
| 3 | CAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 5 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
| 6 | LIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 7 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 8 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 9 | TIAN Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 9% |
| 10 | PELLERIN Liam | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 10 | WU Yulen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 16% |
| 12 | FANG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
| 14 | XIA Wenhao | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 17% | 1% | |
| 15 | FOMIN Dash | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 16 | YANG Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 17 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% |
| 18 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 19 | TARDIFF Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 6% |
| 20 | DEL VALLE-LIN Julian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 21 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 12% |
| 22 | YU Adam | 100% | 99% | 78% | 29% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 24 | MOON Nolan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 25 | BRYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 64% | 12% | |
| 26 | LU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | 2% |
| 27 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | BRADY David | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | SAVIR Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | LEONG Michael | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WANG Timothy | 100% | 95% | 50% | 10% | - | - | |
| 32 | STARK Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | RENSHAW Hunter | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | BERLOW Hudson | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | KISHAN Samridh | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 37 | WANG Grant | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | HO Marcus | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 39 | THAKKAR Advait | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Tingrui | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 42 | JUTAGIR Eugene | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 43 | CUI Jason | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | RICE Henry | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | ZHU Winston | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SALERNO A.J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 47 | HWANG Samuel | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | KAZAKOV Alexander | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 49 | WENG Luke Missing ID | |||||||
| 50 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | LIU Max | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | LI Ethan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | ZEI Julian | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | CAI Charlie | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LEE Elijah | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.