Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 2 | ZHANG Marcus Xuanwei | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 3 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | < 1% |
| 3 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 5 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - |
| 6 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 7 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 8 | KABA Elias | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 9 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 10 | LEE Elijah | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 11 | ASHLEY Logan | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 12 | WANG Marcus | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 13 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 14 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 15 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 16 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 17 | LIN Lucas | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | |
| 18 | CHEN Evan | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | RUDIGER George | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 20 | JIN Noah | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | |
| 21 | BURDICK Elijah | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | ZHU Brady | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | LAKSHMAN Vishnu | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 25 | JIANG Aidan | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | YONG Connor | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 28 | KLOTS Theo | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 29 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 30 | LIU Easun | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | - | - | - | - | < 1% | - |
| 34 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 35 | LEE Asher | 100% | - | - | - | < 1% | - | - |
| 36 | CARPENTER Touma S. | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | DAI Jason | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | GILLARD Adan | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | GAO Ryan | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | MANUEL Eli | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | LEE Ryan | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 45 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | - | - | < 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | ZOU Grant | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | - | < 1% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | TANG Luke | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 51 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 52 | QI Bryan | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 53 | KIM Brendan | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 54 | YADAV Aarav | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 55 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 56 | JEONG Joseph | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 57 | MILOWSKY Majai | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 58 | JIN Derek | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 59 | CARPENTER Taisei | 100% | < 1% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 60 | BUTLER Xavier | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 60 | LANE Sawyer | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 63 | LIU George | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 64 | SHKOP Alexander | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 65 | CHEN Caleb | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 66 | APFELBAUM Noam | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 67 | CHANG Connor | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 67 | NAGELHOUT Cole | 100% | - | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.