Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 2 | LYU Brandon | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 69% |
| 3 | YANG Steve | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
| 3 | LI Yunze | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
| 5 | YU Jinyuan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 6 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
| 7 | GU Evan | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | KAJITA Grayson | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 9 | RAJ Yojith | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 10 | CREMEL Remi | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 11 | SITU Baiqin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 12 | NGUYEN Norris | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 49% | 14% |
| 13 | ZHANG Bryant | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 14 | LI Lief | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 15 | LEE Juneau | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
| 16 | AGARWAL Jagrav | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 17 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 18 | LIN Dylan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 19 | CHENG Alvin | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | LIU Aiden | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | VIEN Bradley | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 22 | LIN Zhengxuan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 23 | LEBURU Abhiram | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 24 | SHAO Tysen | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | WANG Theodore | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | XIE Garrett | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | LI Mason | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | XU Benjamin | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | MENG Andy | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | TAN benjamin | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | ZENG Cayden | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | YAN Aaron | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 33 | SHENOY Neil | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | SHENOY sean | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | JACOBE Jakyn | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LUO Derren | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | STOCK Ian | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | LIN Cyrus | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LIU Kevin | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 40 | SAXENA Niven | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HO Kasper | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | GEMBALA Theodore | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | SINGH Shiv | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SCHOR William | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | JAIN Shubhit | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 46 | SIN Chad | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | WU Kangdi | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MANANSALA Caleb | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | BHANGOO Arman | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | ZUO Thomas | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | DONG YIKUN | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | WANG Ian | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | HOVAGHIMIAN Atticus | 7% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | KIM Owen | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHANG George | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SHANG Jason | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | ZHENG Ivan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 58 | YETCHERLA Aarya | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | WONG Kingston | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 60 | LEE Reiden | 8% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GOLDSMID Owen | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | YANG Jaron | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.