Tryon Palace - Wilmington, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | 1% | 12% | 51% | 36% |
| 2 | HOWARD Gregory | - | - | 10% | 34% | 40% | 16% |
| 3 | KMIEC Stephen M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 50% | 32% |
| 3 | RUSSELL James | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 44% | 14% |
| 5 | CLICK Tristan | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
| 6 | DILDA Griffin | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% | |
| 7 | JONES Jackson | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 29% | 4% |
| 8 | MASON Shane A. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% |
| 9 | GADOW Patrick | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 10 | HATCHER David | 1% | 16% | 44% | 33% | 6% | |
| 11 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | - | 1% | 24% | 45% | 26% | 3% |
| 12 | VERGARA Jace Riley | 2% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | O'DEA Ryan | - | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 1% |
| 14 | CHILDS Edward B. | 5% | 73% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 15 | SANTIAGO Charles | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | CRAWFORD Charles (Marston) M. | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
| 17 | WIMMER Steven | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 18 | WILSON Carl | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 19 | HARRIS Lynn B. | 15% | 50% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | REBER Eleanora (Nora) A. | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 21 | HOWARD Jack | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | MILLER Debi | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 23 | JULIEN Erica | 19% | 46% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | SANFORD Kenyatta L. | - | 8% | 41% | 42% | 8% | - |
| 25 | WIMMER Daniel | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | BASNIGHT Eden | 70% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 27 | FARRER Brennecke E | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 28 | WIMSATT Andrew | 9% | 70% | 19% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | MILLER Ryan M. | < 1% | 1% | 13% | 49% | 33% | 4% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.