MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
2 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% |
3 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
3 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 22% | |
5 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
6 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
7 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
8 | LI Meilin | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
9 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
10 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
11 | CHEN Jessie S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
12 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | |
13 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - |
14 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
15 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
16 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
17 | VEERKAMP Molly | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
18 | LEVI Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
19 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 11% |
20 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 10% | |
21 | XUE Alanna | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
22 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
23 | PATEL Anika | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
24 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
25 | XU Madison | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
26 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
27 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 2% | |
28 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
29 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | |
31 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
32 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
34 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
35 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
36 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | SU Michelle | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
40 | WEBB Ella | 100% | 99% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
41 | FU Qihan | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
42 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 78% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
43 | GUO Jessica | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.