MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 2 | KANG Michael H. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | V V D V D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 3 | KIM Juni C. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | MERCHANT Reza H. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 6 | MARCHANT Albert J. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | SPANO Gideon S. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 8 | SOOMRO Adam A. | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 9 | GAIDAR Daniel B. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 10 | ZHANG Matthew | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | MARRAN Erik R. | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | V D V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 13 | MORSE Tyler | D D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 14 | HERMANSON David B. | D V D V D | V V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 15 | HONG James | D D V D D D | V V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 16 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | D V D D D D | V V D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
| 17 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V D V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | V D V V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 19 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | SHREM Samuel G. | V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | LIBSON Tazman | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 22 | FELDMAN Jaemin | V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | CHEUNG Liyan | V V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 24 | FERREIRA Noah J. | D D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | LANGTON Sawyer | D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | JACKSON Anthony I. | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 27 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | GOHEL Dayus T. | D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 30 | LI Jeffrey | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 31 | TONG Chihao | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 32 | WADE Grayson | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | MACKIN Samuel | D V V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 34 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 34 | KUMAR Anitya | V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 36 | YOO David D. | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 37 | REYES Vincent | V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 38 | DIXON Samuel | D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 39 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 40 | DIXON Thomas | D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 40 | DISIMONE David Z. | V D D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 42 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 43 | PARK Brian | D D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 44 | MENZIE Kevin | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 45 | STANLEY Dominick | D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 46 | BLANCHARD Jonah | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 47 | WU Joseph | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 48 | KWONG Jason | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 49 | HE Lawrence | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 50 | ANDERSON Riley | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.