MAPLEWOOD, NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JIMENEZ Diran | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | LEUNG Wai Chi Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | SHA Yi Peng | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
| 3 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | V V D D V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 5 | BAS Liam | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | BAE Kevin | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 7 | LIN Richard W. | V V D V D V | V V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 8 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V D V D V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 9 | VASILIEV Sacha M. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 10 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | BREIER Matthew F. | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | LE Vyn A. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 14 | KWON Ethan | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | WEINKOPF William O. | D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 16 | WU Jerry | V V D V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 17 | LI Richard | V V V V V V | D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 18 | NAGER Noah | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 19 | GALLUCCI Charles John | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 20 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | MENG Zhaoyi | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | BALL James T. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 23 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | SHIKHMAN Robert | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | SCHENCK Koen M. | V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | AHN Jun | D D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | KAO Castor T. | D V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 28 | SHIN Joshua J. | V V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | ANTON Nathaniel | V D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 30 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | D V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 31 | DEGREMONT Henri S. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 32 | BAO Wenyuan | D D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 33 | DESOLA Aidan J. | D D V V V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | PAN Eric | V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 35 | VERSTEELE Sander | V D V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 36 | DU Samuel R. | D D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 37 | HONG Issac | V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 38 | WEI William | D V D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 39 | OUYANG Matt J. | D V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 41 | WERWA Griffith | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 41 | ARANA Massimo | D V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 43 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | D D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 44 | NG Jeremiah | D D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
| 45 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 47 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 48 | MCLENDON Diego | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 48 | ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 50 | ZHAO Jesse | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 51 | MECINSKI Henrik | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 52 | TOMRUK Batu | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 53 | DE JAGER Robert | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 54 | GUO Sean | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.