Middlebury Union Middle School - South Burlington, VT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MIAN Ismail | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 66% | |
| 2 | BUSH Thomas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 3 | MORI Seneca | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 3 | CAO Gavin | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 5 | DOELEMAN Zeno | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 6 | MAY Ciaran | - | 7% | 31% | 45% | 16% | 1% | |
| 7 | KOMPARE Matthew | 1% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 8 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 9 | CHOI Paul S. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 9 | NUTOVYCH David | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 11 | WHITEHURST JJ | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 40% | 9% |
| 12 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | - | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 13 | WALTING Paul J. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 14 | MARCOUX Alexander | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 15 | ZHANG Eric I. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | LIN George | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 17 | QUINLAN Sean | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 18 | LELAND James (Jim) E. | 2% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | - | |
| 19 | RUGGLES William R. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 20 | LAROCHELLE Bastien | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
| 21 | MEAGHER Roderick | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 22 | MACIK Axel | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | FERLAND Brent | 4% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 24 | MISSERT Justin | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | PEARSALL William | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | SCHUPPE Ray W. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | MCCAULEY Aidan | - | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | 2% | |
| 28 | LUSSIER Jesse B. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 29 | BIXBY Peter W. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 30 | BOYINGTON Bree | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | KROHN Matthew | 12% | 46% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | D'SOUZA Carlisle (Charlie) J. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 33 | SIRBU Aurelia | 28% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | GLAZER Adam | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | KASTANAS Stamatia Tina | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | COLLIER Samara | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 37 | FOSTER Christopher | 1% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 9% | - | |
| 38 | POWERFREEMAN Mark | 15% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PIZZUTO Sally | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | WHEELER Michele L. | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | BAKERROUSE Toby | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | POPE MCCRIGHT Emma | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | MARCOUX Amy | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.