Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
| 2 | RACHTCHININE Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 3 | LICHTEN Keith H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 3 | KROGH Dan Krogh (Dan) M. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | HEDGES Philip S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% |
| 6 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | PRIHODKO Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 8% |
| 8 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 9 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 10 | MEEHAN Justin X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 11 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 12 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 4% |
| 13 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 14 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 15 | PHO Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |
| 16 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | GATES Darcy C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 18 | BLAT Robert | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 19 | HABIB Farooq | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 21% | |
| 20 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | DENYSSEVYCH Ivan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | BARTLETT Jonathan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 7% |
| 24 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% | |
| 25 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 26 | MARSH Timothy G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 29 | MCNAMARA Scott | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | MINOTT Nicolas D. | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 32 | BAILEY Creston P. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | |
| 34 | HUNTER Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
| 35 | JOYCE David | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 36 | GALEOTTI Loriano | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 37 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
| 38 | CLAWSON Brian C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 39 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | - |
| 40 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 41 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | COETZEE Frans M. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | DELONG Mike | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HARRIS Robert S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | KREMPASKY John H. | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | MENDOZA Zandro | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | CAMPBELL Paul | 100% | 69% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | DAVIS Kelly | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 99% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | KOKENGE Chad | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | STERR Eric | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | CHOI Paul S. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
| 54 | ROGERS John D. | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.