Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RECKLING Kathleen A. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | KERR Margaret E. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | MADDOX Lacey E. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | FEDDE Rachel A. | V V D D V | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 5 | MCGRATH Polina S. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | BROWN Rachel (Rachel Brown) F. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | LIPPAI Sarah | D V V V V | V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 8 | TRELOAR Allison F. | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | CHOY Ida | V V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 11 | LOVE Georgina | V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 12 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 13 | FAGAN Margaret | D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 14 | JOLITZ Cornelia | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | LEE Claire L. | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 17 | HERMES Kathleen A. | V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 18 | ORLOVA Elena | D V V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 19 | CHUANG Jocelyn | V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | MORRISON Monica L. | D V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 21 | SHANKS Jennifer | D D V V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 22 | JACKSON Wilma S. | D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 23 | READ Sarah | D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 24 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | V D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 25 | MARRELLI Carolina | D D D D V V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 26 | HUEY Sharone A. | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 26 | FERGUSON Diane F. | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 28 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | V D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 29 | SOBISKY Kari | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 29 | MOORE Annette | D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 29 | ARANGO PINEDO Catalina | D D D D D | V D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 32 | CHRISTOPHER Carolyn | D D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | CAWTHORN Muriel C. | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 34 | TASKER Monisha B. | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 35 | LONG OKURA Rebecca | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 36 | SELTZER Eve | D D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 37 | ROSENFELD Madelon M. | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.