Division 1 & Para Championships / April NAC

Veteran Men's Épée

Saturday, April 25, 2026 at 8:00 AM

Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 RODNEY Adam R. D V V V V V V V V V V V 5.8 5 -0.8
2 TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
3 MANDOKI Sandor I. V V D D V V V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
3 MENDOZA Zandro D V V V D V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
5 MACZIK Adam W. V D V V V V V V V V D 5.5 5 -0.5
6 GATES Darcy C. D V V V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
7 SUVOROV Yuly V V V D V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
8 HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. V V V V D D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
9 CHENG Thomas V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
10 PHO Eric V V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
11 HEDGES Philip S. V V V V V D V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
12 LEHFELDT Damien S. D V V D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
13 LICHTEN Keith H. V V V V D D V V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
14 FRANK Fred V V D D V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
15 SNIDER Jeffrey H. D V V D V D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
15 GREGORY Dean D D D V V V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
17 GERSEN Jacob V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
18 DEUCHER Joseph H. V D V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
19 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. V D V V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
20 OLIVERIUS Joseph W. D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
21 CRANOR Erich L. V V D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
22 COETZEE Frans M. V V V D V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
23 MAZZOLI Julio C. V D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
24 CHRISTY Peter C. V V D V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
25 RACHTCHININE Alexandre V D V V V D V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
26 PEI Suyang V V D V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
27 HITCHCOCK David V V D D V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
28 GROSSE Michael V V D V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
29 KMIEC Stephen M. V V D D V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
30 NEWSOME James L. D V V V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
31 PERKA Michael D D D V V V V D 2.9 2 -0.9
32 SWANSON Dave D D V D D D V V D 2.1 1 -1.1
33 HALLMAN Nicholas (Nick) J. V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
34 LIOU Solomon V V V V V V D 4.3 6 +1.7
35 CARTER Austin L. V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
36 KROGH Dan Krogh (Dan) M. V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
37 COX Matthew T. V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
38 KIM Jeff V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
39 PRIHODKO Andrew D V V V V V V 4.4 5 +0.6
40 HABIB Farooq V V V V V D V D 4.8 5 +0.2
41 HUNTER Justin V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
42 YAKIMENKO Andrei V D V V D V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
43 WHEELER Daniel V V D V V D V D 4.8 4 -0.8
44 ZUCKER Noah L. D V V V V D V D 4.9 4 -0.9
45 MARSH Timothy G. D V D V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
46 LOCASALE Nicholas A. V V D V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
46 LAWLOR Lee V D D V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
48 KENT Dwain V D V V V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
49 OZANNE Jeffrey S. D V D V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
49 CHU Brandon A. V D V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
51 CLAWSON Brian C. V D V V V D V D 4.0 4 -
52 KOKENGE Chad V D V V D V V D 1.5 4 +2.5
53 MEGGERS Samuel V D D V V V D 1.4 3 +1.6
54 LOEFFLER Carl E. D V V V D D V D 4.5 3 -1.5
55 RODACHY Jeffrey M. V V D D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
56 BLAT Robert D D V D V V V D 3.0 3 -
57 JOYCE David V V D D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
58 DEPOMMIER Remi V V D D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
59 SANTOS Felipe V D V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
60 HARRIS Robert S. D D V D V D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
61 KING Richard (Dick) M. V D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
62 MARINI Davide D D D D V V D 1.3 1 -0.3
63 BAXTER David D V D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
64 BARTLETT Jonathan R. D V D D D D V D 4.4 1 -3.4
65 BRUS Brian V. V V D V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
66 ALTMAN Jeff H. D V V V V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
67 HUGHES Michael D. D V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
68 MORET Eric N. D V V D V V D 2.6 4 +1.4
68 CHOI Paul S. D V V V D V D 3.4 4 +0.6
70 WILSON Jeffrey M. V V D V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
71 KRYLTSOV Greg V V V D D D 2.4 3 +0.6
72 FREY Wayne N. D V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
73 CAMPBELL Paul V D V D D V D 1.2 3 +1.8
74 MARKOWITZ William M. V D D D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
75 WINKLER Michael D V V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
76 O'DOWD Andrew J. D V V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
77 EVANS Allen L. D V V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
78 COLE Matthew V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
79 LIPTON Michael D. D D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
80 KLINE R. Jay D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
81 KREMPASKY John H. V D V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
82 KASKAN Peter E. D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
83 SIMMONS Matthew C. D V D D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
83 WILLIAMS Charles V D D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
85 DAVIS Kelly V D D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
86 LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. D V V D D D D 3.5 2 -1.5
87 EVERT Todd D D D D V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
88 MOLLINIER TOUBLET Bertrand V D D D V D D 1.0 2 +1.0
89 NEMAZIE David A. V D D D V D D 2.8 2 -0.8
90 WU Robert D D D V V D D 0.7 2 +1.3
91 REED David D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
92 NEALE James H. D D V V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
93 GAO "George" Xiaojiang D D D D V D 0.7 1 +0.3
94 DENYSSEVYCH Ivan D D D D V D D 3.5 1 -2.5
95 DELONG Mike D D D V D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
96 BECK Brian C. D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
97 WALTING Paul J. D D D V D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
98 TKACH Robert W. D V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
98 LEE Wei-Sheng D D D V D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
100 ARMSTRONG Payton D D D D D V D 0.1 1 +0.9
101 SIMS Martin L. D D D D D V D 0.5 1 +0.5
102 MIZRAHI Meir V D D D D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
103 ERTEL Mark C. V D D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
103 PIERRO Roger D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
105 RIFKIND Neil D D D V D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
106 STAFURIK John (Jack) W. D D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
106 MCNALLY Thomas J. D D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
108 KERTESZ Stefan G. V D D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
109 KUHN Jeffrey D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
110 DOWNEY Gerard C. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
111 VALENTINE Shem D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
112 WHITELOCK James R. D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
113 NUDELMAN Aleksandr D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
114 BOYKO Frank C. D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
114 ALEKSEEV Konstantin D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
116 ROGERS John D. D D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.