Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Charlson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 2 | ROHRLACK Charles (Charlie) F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 17% |
| 3 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 27% |
| 5 | ZHOU Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 6 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 7 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 8 | PARK Justin W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 9 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 10 | BOOTH Zaheer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
| 11 | MARSEE James | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 12 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 13 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 14 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 15 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
| 16 | OSTER Keegan J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 18 | AURAY Phileas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
| 19 | KOKOSINSKI Eryk | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 20 | HU William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 21 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 22 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 24 | ZHANG Michael M. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | DEMAREST Iain | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 27 | LAU Jeremy Y. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 28 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 29 | GRUBE Sterling T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 30 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 31 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 32 | SMITH Mitchell M. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 33 | BUENAVENTURA Christian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 34 | KANG Brandon M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 35 | CHEN Howard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 36 | MULVANEY Alec S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
| 37 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 38 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 39 | LO Joshua H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 40 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | GRATHWOL-SEAR Sebastian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | VACCARI Braden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 45 | AUSTIN Adam | 100% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
| 48 | SMITH David C. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 49 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 50 | DANNULL Lukas J. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 51 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 5% | |
| 51 | TONG Qilin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% | |
| 53 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | RAINVILLE-POND Schuyler J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 55 | RAI Avin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 56 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 57 | HAN Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 58 | DANNULL Linus N. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 59 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
| 59 | REESE Aaron S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 59 | DAMMER Mark W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 20% | |
| 62 | DILLREE Spencer S. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 63 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 10% |
| 64 | DESAI Drewv D. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | WANG Qifa | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 66 | FLORES Peter D. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 67 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 68 | MILLER Levi H. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 68 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 70 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 71 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 69% | 36% | 9% |
| 72 | KIM Benjamin H. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 73 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
| 74 | RAMAN Easwer | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 75 | KARNES Jameson D. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 76 | LIN William | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 77 | ARNIPALLI Shanvanth | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | STRONG Jr James S. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 80 | STREB JR. Joseph T. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 80 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 80 | BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 83 | HOLMES Aiden G. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 84 | YEN Preston | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 84 | KAHN Justin M. | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 86 | FEENEY Sean | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 86 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 89 | DOARES Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 90 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 91 | RIGGINS Littleton K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 92 | YATES Colum C. | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 93 | COTTER Liam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
| 94 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 95 | WOLIN Zachary A. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 96 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 97 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 98 | CHIEN Phillip L. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 99 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 100 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 101 | HARRIS Alex K. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 102 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 103 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 56% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | HUAYTA James W. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | WUN William | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 106 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | 100% | 99% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 107 | CHANG Eliot A. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 108 | MONTGOMERY Jadon T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 109 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 73% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 110 | OFFUTT Tyler T. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 111 | YAN Jack P. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 112 | LAI Eric A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 113 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 114 | PARKER Timothy S. | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.