San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIN Joshua | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 2 | CANDELA Nicholas | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% |
| 3 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 3 | KIM PAUL | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 5 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 6 | LEVY Zachari I. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 25% |
| 7 | AU Marcus J. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 8 | COOPER Rowan | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 9 | CAI Kevin P. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 10 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
| 11 | SHUR Yakov C. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 12 | ROBINSON Riley | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
| 13 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 14 | JOSEPH Abey | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | DORRELL Connor I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 11% |
| 16 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 17 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 18 | MIELE Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 19 | SIVAGAR Leo | - | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | LIU Kirk D. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | JEON Alexander E. | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 22 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% |
| 23 | VELUVALI Vivek S. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 24 | DUONG Enoch | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 25 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 26 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 27 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 6% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | SHAMIS Mark | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 29 | PALLI Maximillian | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | WONG Nathan | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KOH Tommy | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | GARRETT Samuel | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | 4% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | CHON Joshua | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | MA Victor | 61% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ARABACI Jack A. | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LOUIE Jason | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HE Jason | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 41 | LIANG Aaron | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 42 | SHOEMAKER Thomas P. | 14% | 45% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | STENNIS Brendan | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 9% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | PELAYO Raphael | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | HAINES Reagan | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MILEY Nick N. | 2% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 47 | WANG Andrew | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.