San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 2 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
| 3 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 3 | KIM PAUL | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 5 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 6 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 25% |
| 7 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | COOPER Rowan | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 9 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
| 10 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% |
| 11 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 25% |
| 12 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 13 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 14 | JOSEPH Abey | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 15 | DORRELL Connor I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 11% |
| 16 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 17 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 18 | MIELE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 19 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 20 | LIU Kirk D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 21 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 22 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% |
| 23 | VELUVALI Vivek S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 24 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 2% |
| 25 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
| 27 | ANDERSON Elias W. | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | SHAMIS Mark | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 29 | PALLI Maximillian | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | POPOVICI Andrew E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 32 | KOH Tommy | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 33 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | CHON Joshua | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 37 | MA Victor | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 60% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LOUIE Jason | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HE Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 42 | SHOEMAKER Thomas P. | 100% | 86% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | PELAYO Raphael | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | HAINES Reagan | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 98% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.