San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CANDELA Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | |
| 2 | MACHULSKY Ned | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 3 | SHIN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | 18% | |
| 3 | SHUR Yakov C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 47% | 9% | |
| 5 | WISOFF Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
| 6 | SHARMA Sanil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 7 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 8 | NG Alexander M. | 100% | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 9 | NGUYEN Ethan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% |
| 10 | KIM PAUL | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 11 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 12 | HE Jason | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 13 | VAN EIKEMA HOMMES Neil B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 14 | CAI Kevin P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 15 | GHILDIYAL Manyu | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin I. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | DORRELL Connor I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | JEON Alexander E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
| 19 | LIANG Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 20 | SHAMIS Mark | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 21 | LIU Bennett | 100% | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | LEVY Zachari I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% | |
| 23 | ROBINSON Riley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 24 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 25 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 26 | MA Victor | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | RAKHIMI Marat T. | 100% | 89% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | SIVAGAR Leo | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 30 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | ARABACI Jack A. | 100% | 69% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | HAINES Reagan | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 74% | 26% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | PALLI Maximillian | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | SMITH Zane A. | 100% | 94% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | KOH Tommy | 100% | 97% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | VELUVALI Vivek S. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
| 39 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | LOUIE Jason | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | LIU Felix | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | MILEY Nick N. | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.