St. Louis, MO - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
2 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
3 | ZHANG Luke T. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
3 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
5 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
6 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 34% | 7% |
7 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
8 | MCLAUGHLIN Lloyd I. | 12% | 50% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
9 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
10 | WEN George C. | - | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
11 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
12 | LEE Aidan | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
13 | FOGELSON Frederick J. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
14 | SONG Leonardo T. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
15 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
16 | OH Jonathan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
17 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
18 | ZHAO Jason L. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
19 | REEVES Liam | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
20 | NG Eben S. | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
21 | KEE Andrew L. | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
22 | YANG Luao | - | 1% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
23 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | ROBINSON Keegan B. | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
26 | FINLEY Dylan | 4% | 36% | 39% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
27 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
28 | TANG Owen S. | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
29 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
30 | RUSADZE Nickolas | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
31 | GATZA Logan | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
32 | LIU Jacob B. | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | JI Aidan Y. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
34 | MILLER Duncan R. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
35 | GOOR Julian | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
36 | DESHMUKH Arjun | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
37 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 95% | 5% | - | - | - | - | |
38 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 24% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
39 | LIU Michael H. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
40 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
41 | ROEVER Sean M. | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
42 | IVES William R. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
43 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
44 | CHOE Jayden K. | 57% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | |
45 | ABRAHAM Aharon | 28% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | PARK Stephen | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.