Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
2 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
3 | OH SEAN | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
3 | JITTAN daniel | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 45% |
5 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
6 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
7 | CANO Marcos E. | - | 8% | 33% | 44% | 15% | ||
8 | LONG Connor M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
9 | HEARN Christen J. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
10 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 47% | 18% |
11 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
12 | SAGE Michael J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
13 | MAHRAN-GALINDO Alex | - | - | 2% | 12% | 37% | 40% | 9% |
14 | ZHAO Dylan L. | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
15 | WONG Garrick G. | - | 1% | 15% | 44% | 40% | ||
16 | BERNABE Rafael | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | GIBBS Grant N. | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | ||
18 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - |
19 | TANG Owen S. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 35% | 7% |
20 | LEE Jacob | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | ROSE Ben | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
22 | KNIZHNIK David | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | TANG August L. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
24 | SONG Austin | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
25 | QIAN Jason H. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
26 | YANG Alan H. | 4% | 35% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
27 | LEE Lukas | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
28 | ROSS III Paul D. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | QUINTERO Julian | 20% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
30 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
31 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
32 | CHEN Junxuan | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
33 | HYUN Seojun | 1% | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
34 | BERNARD Jack B. | 18% | 45% | 30% | 7% | - | ||
35 | YUAN Austin | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | ||
36 | HUANG Justin | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | PANTIN Ethan M. | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | WANG Brayden | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
39 | DICKSON Evan | 30% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
40 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.