Santa Clara, CA - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 2 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 64% | |
| 3 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 12% |
| 3 | XIAO Edward | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 5 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 5 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% |
| 7 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 8 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 15% | |
| 9 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 10 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 7% |
| 11 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 12 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 13 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 28% | |
| 14 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 15 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 16 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 9% |
| 17 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 43% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 36% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 22 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 23 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 24 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 26 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | AMAYA Jared C. | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 28% | 3% | |
| 32 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 33 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 12% |
| 34 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | TAPUS Alexandru | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | MA Bryant | 100% | 98% | 77% | 31% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 39 | WONG Matthew H. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 40 | BELANGER Jackson | 100% | 92% | 50% | 11% | - | - | |
| 41 | HIGHTOWER Palmer | 100% | 49% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 92% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | WHITE Austin M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | BARTELS Milo | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | WONG Louis | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | WACHTEL Oliver | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 92% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 93% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | UPENDER Sky | 100% | 70% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.