Cincinnati, OH - Cincinnati, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | OUIMET Francois | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
2 | WANG Bowen | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
3 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
3 | BEAULIEU Loic | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
5 | FREDERIKSEN Elijah L. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% |
6 | SANTOS Cameron A. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
7 | NORTH Gary S. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
8 | MANDOKI Sandor I. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
9 | STONE Brian M. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
9 | WEISSMAN Kai E. | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
11 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
12 | MILLER Finn S. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
13 | HAN Matthew | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
14 | LUNDBORG Jr. Tad C. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
15 | GORDON Reis J. | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
16 | MAISEL Simon F. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
17 | MANCINI Christopher M. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
18 | MAZUR Mykhaylo Y. | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
19 | WEISS Miles J. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
20 | YI Kyle | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | SJOSTEDT Jacob H. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
22 | LICHTEN Keith H. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
23 | DAVIES Morgan | 2% | 20% | 46% | 27% | 5% | ||
24 | GRUPP Tristan E. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
25 | KIM Ethan J. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
26 | DINKINS Ramadan | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
27 | KANG Michael H. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
28 | LEIGH David A. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
29 | BEDOR William J. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
30 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
31 | STADNIKOV Tom | - | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
32 | KOZLOWSKI Matthew K. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
33 | BASOK Daniel | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | |
34 | MALIASSOV Nikita S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
35 | LI Jesse | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
36 | MARTIN Liam N. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
37 | KIM Derek D. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
38 | WOLF Myles J. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
39 | KAMBESELES Peter G. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
40 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
41 | ROGAK Benjamin A. | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
42 | KLASSEN Andrew P. | 6% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
43 | IYOKI Kent | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
44 | CHIEN Brandon | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
45 | PLUMER Jack E. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
46 | FULLER George K. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
47 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
48 | BAILEY Nathan W. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
49 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
50 | SHIREY Daniel L. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
51 | MCKINLEY Liam K. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
52 | SEABURY Maxwell G. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
53 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 32% | 32% | 13% |
54 | SHORT Salim (Sal) A. | 27% | 49% | 22% | 2% | - | ||
55 | ARMSTRONG James G. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
56 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
57 | EDWARDS Ethan S. | - | 1% | 18% | 51% | 29% | ||
58 | LAURON Sean M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
59 | HAREL Jason | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | BAKER Kevin G. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
61 | COHEN Jared E. | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
62 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
63 | MCCORMICK John B. | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | BURKE Matthew C. | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
65 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
66 | AJNSZTAJN Alec J. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
67 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
68 | RUSSANOV Boris J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
69 | MA Ark | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
70 | LENDER David | - | 1% | 17% | 46% | 36% | ||
71 | LU Chung | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
72 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
73 | STEELE DeMario A. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
74 | MOGILEVICH Michael | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
75 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
76 | VARNEY John R. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
77 | LEE Timothy S. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
78 | CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
79 | BOYLAN Jack (I Spy) | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | |
80 | MCDERMOTT Brian | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
81 | CRASWELL Andrew J. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
82 | COULL Abraham (Abe) | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
83 | SPIER Julian H. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
84 | KIM Ethan S. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
85 | ATANAS Matthew M. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
86 | ASHER Andrew D. | 47% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
87 | GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) | 45% | 46% | 8% | - | - | ||
88 | STOTT Donovan R. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
89 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
90 | SMITH Justin C. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
91 | COTTER Alexander J. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
92 | BETHEL Dylan A. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
93 | KLINE R. Jay | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
94 | TOPAZ Nicholas | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
95 | SMITH Calvin R. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
96 | CLINGSHOFF Christopher | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
97 | OH Kevin Y. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
97 | AL-TAYEB Ahmed M. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
99 | DRAKE Owen G. | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
100 | HU Andre B. | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
101 | DAZEY Jason T. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
102 | ALI Adam | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
102 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
104 | ECKEL Anson J. | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
105 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
106 | KRIEGISCH Jacob A. | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
107 | VERNACHIO Anthony | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
108 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
109 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | 7% | 44% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
110 | BAKER Julian L. | 9% | 49% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
111 | FLINT James E. | 58% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.