Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | OH Jonathan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 2 | PAZ Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | BURKE Spencer W. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 5 | GODZHIK Zachary | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 6 | MORALES Ian N. | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 7 | DANKAR Neel | V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | JORDON Kaleb W. | D V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | LEE David Y. | D V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | JAIN Aditya | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | LIN Dashiell | V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 13 | GOLDADE Luke A. | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | XIAO EDWARD | V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 15 | GOBBO Alexander | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | RYOU Aiden | V D D D D | V V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 17 | ZHOU Oscar J. | V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | WU Jerry Z. | D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 19 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | V V D D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 20 | AVRON Case B. | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | LI Ryan Z. | V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | WOMACH Tristan | D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | BAEK David | V D V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 24 | PIESNER Joshua C. | D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | KIM Derek A. | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | DETERING Julian | D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 27 | KIM Banseok | V V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 29 | REDDINGTON aidan | D D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | WONG Luke S. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | NAM Michael | V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 32 | LI Avery Peihong | D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 33 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | D D D V V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 34 | HUANG Kevin D. | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | HARRIS Rhonen | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 36 | LLIDO Soren | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | TANG Adrian | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 38 | OH Jaden | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | JI Evan | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 40 | MU Jeffrey | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 41 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 42 | BERSHIN Izzy | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 43 | NERSISYAN Raphael | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.