Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OH Jonathan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% | |
| 2 | PAZ Ethan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 3 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 3 | LUH Ethan K. | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 7% | |
| 5 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 41% | 11% | |
| 6 | MORALES Ian N. | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 6% | |
| 7 | DANKAR Neel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
| 8 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 9 | LEE David Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | JAIN Aditya | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 12 | LIN Dashiell | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% | |
| 13 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 14 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 15 | GOBBO Alexander | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | RYOU Aiden | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | WU Jerry Z. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 19 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
| 20 | AVRON Case B. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 21 | LI Ryan Z. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | WOMACH Tristan | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | BAEK David | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 24 | PIESNER Joshua C. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 25 | KIM Derek A. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 26 | DETERING Julian | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 27 | KIM Banseok | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 28 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 29 | REDDINGTON aidan | 4% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | WONG Luke S. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | NAM Michael | 21% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | LI Avery Peihong | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 33 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | HUANG Kevin D. | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | HARRIS Rhonen | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | LLIDO Soren | 3% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | TANG Adrian | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | OH Jaden | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | JI Evan | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | MU Jeffrey | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | BERSHIN Izzy | 52% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | NERSISYAN Raphael | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.