Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | WONG Antonio | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 6 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 7 | KIM Ryan Y. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | LLIDO Soren | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 9 | FUKUDA Diego | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 10 | KIM Aiden | V D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 11 | SHEN Owen | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | OH Jaden | V D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 13 | RYOU Andy | D V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | BAUER Roman | V V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 16 | LO Preston | D V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V D V V | D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 18 | WU James | D V V V V | D | 1.3 | 4 | +2.7 |
| 19 | NORIEGA Julian | V V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | DINSAY Kristjan | V V D V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 21 | LEE Dylan | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | WANG Logan | D V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 23 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | D V V D D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 24 | CHOI Ethan | D V D D V | D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 25 | NGUYEN martin | V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | AGRAWAL Niki | D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 27 | SHEN Oliver | D D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 28 | KIM Luke | D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | YI William | D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | ULLOA Trent J. | V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | PARK Gabriel | D D V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 32 | LIEW Harrison C. | V D D D D D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 33 | TSAO Holden | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 34 | ASHJIAN Nicolas | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 35 | PARK Sangmin (Steve) | D D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 36 | TULYAG Azim | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 36 | PARK Sky | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 38 | EDISON Ansel | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | JEONG Taewoo | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 40 | GOLWALA Yash | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.