Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 3 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 3 | WONG Antonio | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 15% | |
| 5 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 6 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 45% | 11% | |
| 8 | LLIDO Soren | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 10 | KIM Aiden | - | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 11 | SHEN Owen | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
| 12 | OH Jaden | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | RYOU Andy | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | BAUER Roman | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 15 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 16 | LO Preston | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
| 18 | WU James | 15% | 44% | 33% | 7% | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | NORIEGA Julian | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 20 | DINSAY Kristjan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 21 | LEE Dylan | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 22 | WANG Logan | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 23 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 25 | NGUYEN martin | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | AGRAWAL Niki | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | SHEN Oliver | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | KIM Luke | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | YI William | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | ULLOA Trent J. | 22% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | PARK Gabriel | 1% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIEW Harrison C. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 33 | TSAO Holden | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | ASHJIAN Nicolas | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PARK Sangmin (Steve) | 1% | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 36 | TULYAG Azim | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | PARK Sky | 34% | 44% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | EDISON Ansel | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | JEONG Taewoo | 50% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | GOLWALA Yash | 87% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.