Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | VANNI Filippo A. | D D V V V | V V V V V V | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 2 | JANG Jaewon | V D D V V V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | ZHANG Henry C. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | PYO Michael M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 5 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | FU Samuel Y. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | SCHULTES Evans | V V V D D V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | BUERGIN Aidan | D D D V V | V V V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 9 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 10 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | PETERS Nathan M. | V V V V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | KOECK Tomas E. | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | ZHOU TIMMY | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 15 | KAO Castor T. | V V D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | GEE Brandon | D D D V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 2 | -2.5 |
| 17 | PETER Griffin | V V D V V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 18 | HERGERT Benito | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | BAE Kevin | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | REGE Advaith | V D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 20 | DING Jonathan | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 22 | MILLER Trent D. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 23 | CRALEY Thomas M. | V V V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 24 | CHAN Tyler | V D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 25 | OUELLETTE David M. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 26 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 27 | LEE Daniel C. | D V V D V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 28 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | DU Samuel R. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 30 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | V V D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 31 | HU Robin | D D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | KEE Andrew L. | D D D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | KWON Ethan | V V D V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 34 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | D V V V D V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 35 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 36 | DESOLA Aidan J. | D V V V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 37 | SHA Yi Peng | V V D D V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 37 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | V D V V D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 39 | SANTULLI Tristan | D V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 39 | JAUME Andrei | D V V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 41 | MONGRELLA III John A. | D D D V V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 41 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | D D V V D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 43 | GUPTA Varun | D V V D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 44 | BING Charles | V V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 45 | STRAYER Andrew | D V D V V D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 46 | DAUM Charlie | V V D D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 47 | CAI Oliver K. | D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 48 | TIAN Aaron C. | D V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 49 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | V D D D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 50 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | V V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 51 | ZHANG Bill | D V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 52 | AHN Jun | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 52 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | V D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 52 | TORRES Treston | V V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 55 | WANG Michael | D D D V D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 56 | PAULSON Connor M. | D D D D V V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 57 | JUDD Mehta J. | D V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 58 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | D D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 59 | MENG Zhaoyi | D D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 60 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 61 | DEEB Adam | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 62 | DESANDO Michael R. | D V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 63 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | D D D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 64 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 65 | LE Vyn A. | V D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 66 | HILMER Michael | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 67 | ARANA Massimo | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 68 | XU Mathu Yang | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 69 | WOLF Vanya | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.