Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VANNI Filippo A. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 2 | JANG Jaewon | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% |
| 3 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 3 | PYO Michael M. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 5 | ANDREWS Nathan J. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 6 | FU Samuel Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | SCHULTES Evans | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 8 | BUERGIN Aidan | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 9 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% |
| 10 | AUGUSTINE Ethan A. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 11 | DOBBINS Evan W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 12 | PETERS Nathan M. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 13 | KOECK Tomas E. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 14 | ZHOU TIMMY | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 15 | KAO Castor T. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 16 | GEE Brandon | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 17 | PETER Griffin | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% |
| 18 | HERGERT Benito | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 19 | BAE Kevin | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | REGE Advaith | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 20 | DING Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 22 | MILLER Trent D. | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | CRALEY Thomas M. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 24 | CHAN Tyler | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | OUELLETTE David M. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 26 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 27 | LEE Daniel C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 28 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
| 29 | DU Samuel R. | - | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 30 | ZELJKOVIC Dusan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 31 | HU Robin | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | KEE Andrew L. | 3% | 18% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | KWON Ethan | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 35 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 36 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 9% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | SHA Yi Peng | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 39 | SANTULLI Tristan | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 39 | JAUME Andrei | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 41 | MONGRELLA III John A. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | GUPTA Varun | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 44 | BING Charles | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 45 | STRAYER Andrew | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 46 | DAUM Charlie | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | CAI Oliver K. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | TIAN Aaron C. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 51 | ZHANG Bill | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | AHN Jun | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 52 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | TORRES Treston | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | WANG Michael | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 56 | PAULSON Connor M. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 57 | JUDD Mehta J. | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | 12% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | MENG Zhaoyi | 14% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | DEEB Adam | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | DESANDO Michael R. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 63 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 64 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | LE Vyn A. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 66 | HILMER Michael | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | ARANA Massimo | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | XU Mathu Yang | 68% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 69 | WOLF Vanya | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.