Manalapan, NJ - Manalapan, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | JOSEPH Willem | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | BUERGIN Aidan | V V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | JAUME Andrei | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | LI Owen | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 7 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V V D V D V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 8 | SANTULLI Tristan | V D V V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 9 | AHN Jun | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | SELL Ethan J. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SZEGO Bence P. | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 12 | BELLUOMO David C. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | D D V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 14 | GARR James D. | V V V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | DAUM Charlie | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | V D D D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 17 | KEE Andrew L. | V V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 18 | FU Yifan | V V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 19 | DEEB Adam | D V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 20 | PAULSON Connor M. | V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | CAPUTO Paul M. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 22 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 23 | HAN Lawrence | V V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 24 | CAI Oliver K. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 25 | LIU Eric Y. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 26 | HORSLEY Alexander | V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 27 | DALBERG Leif | V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | D V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 29 | WERWA Griffith | D D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | VAZQUEZ Sebastian A. | D V V D D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | MENG Zhaoyi | D D V V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 32 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | D V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 33 | NITTEL Jake | V V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 34 | YU Jonathan J. | D D V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 | |
| 35 | PAE Brian L. | V V D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 36 | WANG Alex L. | D D D V V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 37 | HEINRICH Alexander J. | V D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 38 | EIG Ethan A. | D D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 39 | GUPTA Varun | V V D D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 40 | JUSTUS Benjamin | D V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 41 | RADTKE Jakob | D V V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 42 | GISLER Benjamin B. | D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 43 | XIE Javah | V D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 44 | ECK Nathaniel | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | MAYER Richard | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 45 | BROWN Alexander R. | D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 47 | ARANA Massimo | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 48 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 49 | CANO Renzo | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 50 | XU Mathu Yang | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 51 | SZE Timothy | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 52 | SZE Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 53 | TOMASCO Gavin | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.