Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 2 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 42% | |
| 3 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | |
| 3 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 5 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 17% | |
| 6 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | |
| 7 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | 2% |
| 8 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | |
| 9 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 10 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | 3% | |
| 11 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 16% |
| 12 | LEWIS Akhil | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | |
| 13 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 37% | |
| 14 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 17% | |
| 15 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 16 | CULHANE Dechen | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | ARICO Trey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | |
| 18 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 96% | 65% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
| 20 | WONG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% | |
| 21 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
| 22 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% | |
| 24 | GAO Payton | 100% | 84% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | WILL Wrightington | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | |
| 27 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 28 | WANG Julang | 100% | 85% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | JIE WanYue | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WANG Auther | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 35 | YE Gavin | 100% | 85% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | LIM Kevin | 100% | 97% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 38 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | TANG Terry | 100% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | HIGGASON Hugh | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 25% | 2% |
| 42 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 43 | WEI Qian | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 45 | LIM Charlie | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | - | |
| 47 | CHA James | 100% | 92% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | LI Allen | 100% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | XIA Eric | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 98% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 50 | WANG jason | 100% | 97% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | CROWE Adam D. | 100% | 85% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | HUANG James | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | BROOKS Matthew | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.