San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% |
| 2 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% | |
| 3 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
| 3 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
| 5 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 14% | |
| 6 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 18% | |
| 7 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 9% |
| 8 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | |
| 9 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 10 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 11 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | |
| 12 | MURUHIN Yaroslav | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 13 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
| 14 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | |
| 15 | SOMERS Sean | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
| 16 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% | |
| 17 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 5% | |
| 18 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 19 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 20 | XIAO Edward | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 23 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 25 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 6% | |
| 26 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 17% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHEN Bryce | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 28 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 22% |
| 29 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 84% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 31 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
| 32 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 33 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 3% | |
| 34 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 36 | TANG Adrian | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | STIAGUN Nikita | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 82% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 43 | SEEDS Edward T. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | KHER Roan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 45 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 46 | FU Vincent | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 47 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 79% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 49 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 50 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
| 51 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | JUDSON Colin | 100% | 97% | 72% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 54 | MA Andrew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 56 | BELANGER Jackson | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | FINK August | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | LIN Richard | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | WACHTEL Oliver | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | AMAYA Jared C. | 100% | 93% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | WOO Christian | 100% | 94% | 47% | 8% | - | - | |
| 64 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | MA Bryant | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 66 | GERA Kaveer | 100% | 82% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | HIGHTOWER Palmer | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 68 | DOWLING Cian | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.